Research across the library

Search laws, regulations, standards and guides

Suggested searches

Current priorities

2026-07-03Revised Internet Information Service Measures draft2026-06-18Network data risk assessment: draft versus final

What changed

Material differences at a glance

The amendment adds national-policy and artificial-intelligence provisions, links personal-information handling to the PIPL and Civil Code, restructures liability provisions, increases consequence-based penalties, and broadens the extraterritorial provision.

  • New provisions address national cybersecurity policy and artificial-intelligence development and security.
  • Personal-information handling is expressly linked to the PIPL, Civil Code, and other laws and administrative regulations.
  • Liability provisions are reorganized with higher penalties for serious consequences and new mitigation language.

Source comparison

16 reviewed change records
added

New Article 3

Previous rule summary
No equivalent standalone article.
Compared rule summary
Adds a provision on leadership, overall national security, development and security.

Practical impact: Keep this national-policy provision separate from specific operational duties.

Amendment decision item 1. Original editorial summary; the official text controls.

deleted

Former Article 18 → Article 19

Previous rule summary
Article 18 had two paragraphs; the second supported innovative cybersecurity management using new network technologies.
Compared rule summary
Renumbers the article as 19 and removes its second paragraph.

Practical impact: Update clause maps; this is distinct from the separately added AI article.

Amendment decision item 2. Original editorial summary; the official text controls.

added

New Article 20

Previous rule summary
No equivalent standalone AI article; former Article 18(2) had general technology language.
Compared rule summary
Adds AI research, infrastructure, ethics, risk monitoring and security oversight; also supports AI-enabled cybersecurity management.

Practical impact: Policy recognition of AI does not replace applicable AI-service or personal-information rules.

Amendment decision item 3. Original editorial summary; the official text controls.

clarified

Former Article 40 → Article 42

Previous rule summary
Required confidentiality and a protection system for collected user information.
Compared rule summary
Adds an express Civil Code and PIPL cross-reference for personal-information processing.

Practical impact: Cross-reference the specialised personal-information regime rather than treating CSL controls as exhaustive.

Amendment decision item 4. Original editorial summary; the official text controls.

modified

Former Article 59 → Article 61: network operators

Previous rule summary
For specified protection-duty failures: correction and warning; refusal or harmful consequences triggered RMB 10,000–100,000, with RMB 5,000–50,000 for directly responsible managers.
Compared rule summary
Initial failure can additionally attract RMB 10,000–50,000. Refusal or harmful consequences: RMB 50,000–500,000; RMB 10,000–100,000 for directly responsible managers and other directly responsible persons.

Practical impact: Both the sanction stage and the personal-liability scope change. The referenced duties are now Articles 23 and 27.

Amendment decision item 5. Original editorial summary; the official text controls.

modified

Article 61: critical information infrastructure operators

Previous rule summary
Correction and warning; refusal or harmful consequences: RMB 100,000–1,000,000; managers RMB 10,000–100,000.
Compared rule summary
Initial failure can additionally attract RMB 50,000–100,000. The ordinary refusal/consequence entity band stays RMB 100,000–1,000,000; the personal band now also covers other directly responsible persons.

Practical impact: Do not say every existing CII penalty band increased. Separate new initial fines, personal scope and aggravated consequences.

Amendment decision item 5. Original editorial summary; the official text controls.

added

Article 61(3): aggravated consequences

Previous rule summary
Former Article 59 had no equivalent express two-tier consequence band.
Compared rule summary
For the preceding duty failures causing serious consequences, such as large-scale leakage or partial CII loss of function: RMB 500,000–2,000,000; individuals RMB 50,000–200,000. Particularly serious consequences, such as loss of main CII functions: RMB 2,000,000–10,000,000; individuals RMB 200,000–1,000,000.

Practical impact: The RMB 10 million ceiling is not a flat fine for every security incident. Identify duty, responsible entity, causation and consequence tier.

Amendment decision item 5. Original editorial summary; the official text controls.

modified

Former Article 60 → Article 62

Previous rule summary
Covered malicious programs, failures to remedy/report security defects, and premature termination of maintenance.
Compared rule summary
Adds the Article 61(3) consequence bands for the first two categories when the specified consequences occur.

Practical impact: Do not apply the added cross-reference indiscriminately to all three categories.

Amendment decision item 6. Original editorial summary; the official text controls.

added

New Article 63: regulated products

Previous rule summary
Article 23 imposed certification/testing requirements, but there was no corresponding standalone liability article.
Compared rule summary
Adds liability for selling/providing listed non-compliant equipment/products: warning, cessation, confiscation and RMB 20,000–100,000 where illegal gains are below RMB 100,000 or absent; otherwise 1–5 times illegal gains. Serious cases can attract business/licence measures.

Practical impact: Distinguish product eligibility evidence from the buyer's separate security-review obligations.

Amendment decision item 7. Original editorial summary; the official text controls.

modified

Former Article 61 → Article 64

Previous rule summary
Real-identity failures could lead to website closure and specified business/licence measures.
Compared rule summary
Adds application closure to the listed measures.

Practical impact: Review website and app remediation together; this item does not rewrite the entire monetary band.

Amendment decision item 8. Original editorial summary; the official text controls.

modified

Former Article 62 → Article 65

Previous rule summary
For specified certification/testing/risk-assessment or security-information publication violations: warning; refusal/serious cases RMB 10,000–100,000, individuals RMB 5,000–50,000.
Compared rule summary
Adds an initial discretionary RMB 10,000–100,000 fine. Refusal/serious cases: RMB 100,000–1,000,000; individuals RMB 10,000–100,000, plus specified business measures. Article 61(3) applies to the stated aggravated consequences.

Practical impact: Assess the regulated activity and disclosure workflow; do not treat this as a general fine for all security research.

Amendment decision item 9. Original editorial summary; the official text controls.

modified

Former Article 65 → Article 67

Previous rule summary
CII use of products/services without required security-review clearance: stop use; fine of 1–10 times purchase value and individuals RMB 10,000–100,000.
Compared rule summary
Keeps those monetary bands and adds time-limited correction and elimination of national-security effects.

Practical impact: Changes remediation obligations, not the stated purchase-value multiplier.

Amendment decision item 10. Original editorial summary; the official text controls.

modified

Former Article 68 and Article 69(1) → Article 69

Previous rule summary
Prohibited-information handling and compliance with takedown directions were in separate provisions.
Compared rule summary
Combines the duties and introduces initial RMB 50,000–500,000 fines; refusal/serious cases RMB 500,000–2,000,000 and individuals RMB 50,000–200,000. Particularly serious effects/consequences: RMB 2,000,000–10,000,000 and individuals RMB 200,000–1,000,000, with the specified business/licence measures.

Practical impact: Map stopping transmission, removal, record retention and reporting separately. The second paragraph has its own consequence trigger.

Amendment decision item 11. Original editorial summary; the official text controls.

procedural

Former Articles 64, 66 and 70 → Article 71

Previous rule summary
PI infringement, CII overseas storage/transfer and prohibited information had separate liability provisions.
Compared rule summary
Consolidates cross-references to applicable laws and administrative regulations, with a separate police-penalty provision for specified unlawful acquisition/supply of PI short of crime.

Practical impact: A cross-reference is not removal of liability. Identify the specialised legal basis rather than reusing a repealed fine.

Amendment decision item 12. Original editorial summary; the official text controls.

added

New Article 73

Previous rule summary
No equivalent express CSL article referring to mitigation under the Administrative Penalty Law.
Compared rule summary
Expressly applies the statutory circumstances for lighter, reduced or no punishment.

Practical impact: Preserve factual remediation evidence; the provision does not promise automatic leniency.

Amendment decision item 13. Original editorial summary; the official text controls.

modified

Former Article 75 → Article 77

Previous rule summary
Focused on overseas attacks or related activities against PRC CII causing serious consequences.
Compared rule summary
Uses broader conduct endangering PRC cybersecurity, with property freezing or other necessary sanctions possible for serious consequences.

Practical impact: Do not limit the revised wording to CII attacks; distinguish basic liability wording from the serious-consequence sanctions trigger.

Amendment decision item 14. Original editorial summary; the official text controls.

Official sources

Sources checked:

2026-09-11: Corrected the Article 18/19/20 mapping; added amendment-item locators, exact selected penalty bands and Chinese editorial summaries. Not a full translation.

This website is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. The Chinese text shall prevail. Users should consult qualified legal counsel for specific matters.